The Massachusetts Lottery Commission is proposing sweeping modernization, and it has formally stated its intent to look at online ticket sales, also offering its very own daily dream sports and social gaming products.
Massachusetts happens to be making noises about adopting a comprehensive online gaming package for quite a while, since it seeks to complement its emergent land-based casino industry and successful lottery product with a far more up-to-date and competitive online offering.
While Internet casino gaming and poker would require a huge upheaval that is legislative DFS and social video gaming wouldn’t normally ( at the least in the Bay State), plus it’s clear that Massachusetts is intent on creating its fantasy activities product as a means attracting younger generation that eschews traditional draws, scratch cards and keno in favor of more recent, mobile-friendly trends.
As such, their state has launched a formal request for information (RFI), inviting companies to submit ‘proposals for the development, implementation, operational support, and maintenance of the Massachusetts Lottery iLottery System,’ read an official statement.
This will include ‘the development and integration of digital versions of existing and brand new lottery games, including but not limited to social video gaming and daily dream activities choices.’
Of particular interest to the Lottery Commission are player authentication and registration protocols, aswell as best practices for responsible gaming controls.
The commission also states that it is wrestling with ways of integrating lottery ticket stores to be able to protect the 7,500-odd smaller businesses that depend on lottery sales commissions.
‘We think the development of a fantasy activities platform at Massachusetts Lottery would help to embrace a market casino-online-australia.net that is emerging continuing to protect our retail partners,’ Lottery Executive Director Michael Sweeney told the News Service recently.
‘ This particular variety of game would maybe not cannibalize our existing products. It would obviously be a new product. It would help us to engage that which we would refer to as a ‘next-generation’ player and hopefully it would also help Lottery generate a new revenue source in contrast to eroding or maintaining existing offers.’
Throughout the border in nyc State, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is railing from the ‘fraudulent’ nature for the DFS industry, but Massachusetts’ AG Maura Healey has declared there are no federal or state laws and regulations that preclude such sites from operating.
Healy has proposed complete regulation of DFS, drawing up protocols to protect consumers, and has said that state residents who perform DFS should ‘not be concerned’ that they are breaking the law.
After all, there’s nothing wrong with embracing only a little local innovation, and DraftKings, born and bred in Boston, is perhaps benefitting from being truly a homegrown success story.
India Supreme Court Panel Recommends Legalizing Sports Betting
Former India Supreme Court Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha is recommending that the national nation legalize cricket betting and gambling in order to crackdown on corruption. (Image: The Hindu)
Asia is one step closer to legalizing recreations betting and gambling after a panel appointed by the country’s Supreme Court recommended modifying the gaming that is longstanding in order to combat a growing epidemic of illegal wagering.
Home to over 1.2 billion people, India is the second-most country that is populated the globe.
Now three lawmakers, previous Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha, along with retired Justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, opined to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that legalized sports betting would offer more transparency and cut down on rogue backdoor wagering.
‘It [betting] would provide both the game and economy if legalized,’ Lodha told reporters on Monday, adding that the market must be opened, but only with extensive safeguards in place to ensure players and those with direct ties to recreations matches are banned from participating.
Last January, India’s Supreme Court formed the panel, with Lodha serving as chairman, in response to the 2013 Indian Premier League match-fixing scandal that rocked the sport and dominated headlines.
The events of 2013 were unprecedented though the sport of cricket is no stranger to controversy.
The lengthy investigation by Delhi Police led to charges against 39 individuals and two-year suspensions for the Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings cricket teams.
The extensive match-fixing and unlawful betting led the BCCI to do something to improve its infrastructure and appearance for methods to mend its moral standing.
The criminal acts also led to intervention by the Supreme Court and Lodha’s panel concluding that BCCI and India should embrace a controlled gambling market to eradicate illegal betting systems and precisely monitor players and officials.
BCCI Unlikely to Embrace New Vision
Cricket is probably the most popular activity in India, even though the sport’s governing body claims it wants to clean its league up, the federal government might not be so desperate to ending gambling prohibition.
Apart from horse racing, gambling in India happens to be illegal for nearly 150 years.
In addition to proposing cricket that is legal, Lodha’s outline also implies changing the BCCI’s energy framework and organization from top to bottom. The BCCI has remained mum on the Lodha report so far.
The decision to authorize gaming and activities betting doesn’t reside with the BCCI; that task goes to officials on hawaii and levels that are federal.
‘ The federal government will likely keep it alone because it continues to be a contentious issue,’ Asia Bet Managing Director George Oborne told eGaming Review.
Gambling has mostly been a states’ legal rights topic over the full years, but of the nation’s 29 states and seven territories, just three took actions to expand the industry: Goa, Daman, and Sikkim.
Though gambling can provide revenues that are substantial monies for local governments, numerous in India think any expansion of gambling also leads to an expansion in crime, corruption, and money laundering.
Lodha argues gambling’s currently there, albeit illegally, and that swift action must be taken.
‘With big money and attention, there has not been the necessary caution to protect the sport and its players from the orgy of excess,’ he stated.
2nd PokerStars Boycott Struggles to Make Impact After Very First Effort Fizzled
Ike Haxton, who resigned on New Year’s Day as a PokerStars Pro in protest at the changes to the VIP system. (Image: pokerstars.com)
A second PokerStars boycott by high-stakes and high-variance players is apparently neglecting to make a discernible dent, at minimum on the website’s traffic numbers.
Around 1,600 players signed up for the protest, according to organizers.
The previous week, while Sunday, January 3rd remained on par with figures from the same day the previous week per industry number-cruncher PokerScout.com, while traffic dipped on January 1st, the first day of the strike, it actually rose on January 2nd, in comparison with the same day.
Of course, it’s impossible to know just how much the dearth that is sudden of stakes players is affecting PokerStars’ daily rake, and whether all the players whom pledged to stay out have in truth proved real to their word.
The boycott, which is due to get rid of Thursday, January 7th, has been organized by a number of groups including WeArePokerPlayers.com and Tiltbook.com, along with a quantity of high-profile, high stakes players on the 2+2 forums, in protest towards an overhaul that is major the VIP system, which took impact on January 1st.
PokerStars announced in November that these changes would consist of scrapping Supernova Elite rewards for 2016, despite the achievement of this status being a process that is two-year.
PokerStars claims that the changes are created to improve the poker ecology, nevertheless they leave high-stakes, high-volume players high and dry.
While these players represent a few of your website’s most avid, long-lasting, and high-ranking players, they are generally net-withdrawing players rather than the hordes of net-depositors that the internet poker giant is anxious to attract.
The boycott that is first place between December 1st and 3rd, with 2,600 players joining in the sit out. But that occasion clashed with the PokerStars Christmas Festival, so traffic figures remained similar, except that those high-stakes players were changed with lower stakes players attracted by low buy-ins and jackpot prizes.
While PokerStars is probably to have raked less through that period, it declared itself vindicated by the boycott december.
‘During the three-day boycott we recorded the healthiest consecutive three-day ecosystem outcomes of the entire year with steady net gaming revenue, even though our net-depositing players lost at a much lower rate than they’ve all year,’ wrote Eric Hollreiser, VP of Communications for PokerStars and Amaya.
More Boycotts Planned
The affected players remain undeterred, however, and are determined to exhibit PokerStars that they can make the operator’s life hard.
And more boycotts are planned into the future. WeArePokerPlayers.com has launched a campaign searching for 5,000 signatures to accept at the least a strike that is month-long while other protestors have actually suggested that a 10,000-player boycott could reduce PokerStars’ rake by as much as 30 %.
On New Year’s Day, Ike Haxton became the second pokerStars that are high-profile to resign in disgust at the changes, following the example of Alex Millar, who severed ties with all the site prior to the getaway period.
‘As a four time Supernova Elite, I am aware what it requires to rake 1M VPP in a year,’ had written haxton on 2+2. ‘It’s a tough routine. For some of the players who do it, it is a commitment that is all-consuming intense than most full-time jobs.
‘Many of these have relocated far from their homes and families to pursue it,’ he included. ‘Finding out, just while you approach the finish line, that your efforts will never be rewarded as you expected them to be is brutal. We cannot in good conscience carry on to endorse a poker web site that treats its players this way.’